Firstly, I would like to thank and dedicate this project to my husband and kids for their patience, love, and continuous support to me during the dissertation phases.
specifically for you
for only $16.05 $11/page
Also, I would like to thank Mr. Mark Burridge and Mrs. Helen Goworek for putting me on the right track and answering my queries. Their help, via Blackboard, was invaluable in coping with the challenges I have encountered in this research work. Their contribution was vital for me in the preparation of this thesis.
Finally, I would like to express my gratitude to those who have obliged me by spending their precious time in answering the questionnaire and to those researchers past and present for their research papers I have referred to.
This research aims to analyze the service quality perceptions of Airline Passengers and to link these perceptions to their satisfaction and loyalty. Other objectives are to examine whether there is any inconsistency between consumer’s perceptions of service quality and its standard provided by the airlines. By affirming the necessity to maintain quality of service the airline industries can very well generate more satisfaction among the airline passengers by improving the organizational thinking and management strategy through constant identification of service quality factors. This is essential for the progress of any service industry in the present times of globalization.
The required data for this research was gathered from both the primary and secondary sources, in which the primary sources are customer perceptions on service quality obtained through questionnaires. Secondary data was collected from literature and academic reviews on service quality as well as European standards on service quality which gave an understanding of the written quality standards. In choosing the appropriate research methodology the collection and analysis of data were streamlined, and that determined the sample of the study. The sample of the study was based on the customers who use the various airline companies that are operated from or via Cyprus. The non-probability sampling technique helped to determine selected samples of the population that were adjudged to be a typical representation of this population.
To analyze the qualitative information that has been collected in the study, the most suitable data analysis method was adopted by using the statistical measurements derived from the Likert scale. The SPSS computer program provided a descriptive analysis of the standard deviations, and the frequencies were calculated for the five dimensions of the SERVQUAL scale which included airline tangibles, personnel, and empathy along with image and terminal tangibles. From the research findings, it was clear that the airlines’ consumer incentives and marketing activities were only done during high seasons. Consumers were not segmented and hence services meant for one group were mistakably given to another. The personnel was not adequately equipped and motivated to provide quality services to the clients, which in turn contributed much to the poor services offered. Moreover, the lack of individual attention also influenced the perception of the customers. The airline firms should proactively seek to identify and satisfy consumer needs and priorities instead of reacting to external pressures of competition.
The airline firms need to segment their customers according to their similarities which are based on their needs, expectations, and satisfaction. To get customer satisfaction and loyalty, the firms must ensure that their employees are satisfied. This process starts with hiring quality personnel and providing them with incentives that drive them towards achieving customer satisfaction. Services offered can be communicated effectively to the consumers through the technique of making the services tangible by associating the service to particular tangible evidence. Also, there should be proper and concrete steps to make Customer relationship management (CRM) a major tool for maintaining strong customer relationships. It is because CRM is a holistic strategy and must be regarded as such in the service sectors where quality and customers’ perception are the elements that pave way for the success of the industry. Being the main decisive factor, Customer Segmentation must be based on values and needs.
100% original paper
on any topic
done in as little as
Globalization has reduced the realms of the world virtually, and airlines have contributed much to save time and distance from one part of the globe to the other. The travel environment has advanced considerably during the past two decades and the resultant competition is demanding delivery of quality in all modes of passenger services. The success and growth of the service industry depend on the quality of comfort and values extended to the passengers and their perception of what they have received as service. This sort of growth in the satisfaction and loyalty level of the customers applies to all of the service industries, and the airline industry is a prime example to be pointed out.
According to Park et al. (2004); Morash and Ozment (1994), the airline industry faces increased challenges that warrant the advancement of the satisfaction level of the passengers. It is because service quality elements decide upon the passengers’ patronage failing which the perception of the quality of service and loyalty will be thwarted. Therefore, the loyalty to a passenger service provider is directly proportional to the perception of the quality of service given to the users, irrespective of whether it is internal or overseas. Various studies conducted on other service industry sectors have established that quality of judgments is crucial in satisfying the expectation of the customers before the availing of service and the actual service imparted to them.
The survival of an airline in a changing environment is the outcome of the loyalty of the passengers to the company. As such, this research focuses on the ability of the airline industries in imparting the quality of service to the passengers and analyzes the customers’ expectation management of service in the context of organizational strategic thinking. The analysis is meant for deriving quality in service to the airline passengers in comparison to the value of service that is provided to other service sectors. The airline industry is a major sector of the world economy and is vital in determining the progress and prospects of a country. This in reality underlines the truth that the survival of the industries is founded on how the environmental uncertainty is managed for elevating sustainability (Daft, 2006).
The global marketplace has progressed a lot at a quick pace influencing the working of every industry and the progression itself has invited intensification of overall competition in the business sector. The incessant change or evolution in technology, needs, and preferences together with the customers’ urge for getting more and more value-based service, propels the advent of innovated marketing strategies and philosophy of service quality concept. The responsibility to provide quality is not limited to the manufacturers alone, but also is the concern of the air carriers (Ostrowski et al., 1993). To make the competition advantageous, and to retain the customer’s patronage to maintain the market share consistently, proper balancing of service standards is imperative (Park et al., 2004).
Robledo (1996, 1998) states that “Customer satisfaction and loyalty – secured through high-quality products and services providing value for money for the consumer, are essential for long-term survival, let alone long-term success.” As such, to invoke better performance, several studies have been made about the service quality segments, but many of them have ended up in controversies (Parasuraman, Berry & Zeithaml, 1988). The findings reveal the reality that conventional and obsolete marketing strategies require total revamping to accommodate effective management of service quality on par with the expectations of airline passengers. It is because the quality is identified as the causation to satisfaction (Zeithaml and Bitner, 2000).
Significance of the Study
The previous study conducted by Nadiri et al. (2008) has established that the main element that affects the customers’ satisfaction, loyalty, and intention to repurchase a particular airliner service is the fruitful culmination of the airline tangibles. Mouth to mouth communication from the customers’ side has a direct and positive impact on the purchasers to become lenient to the service provider. This denotes that the core objective of any organization is retention and acquisition of new clients, and such retention and acquisition of clients are based on the quality of service rendered to satiate their anticipated service standards. For, the success of every industry lies in the management of an effective quality provision that is extended to the customers, and the airline industry is not at all an exception.
In the case of airline passengers, identifying and prioritizing the factors that are decisive in the matter of their satisfaction level during the course and after the utilization of service are of utmost importance. To make consumer sovereignty effective, consumer satisfaction must be considered as the fundamental principle and guide. According to Bloemer and Kasper (1995), customer satisfaction is simply, but mainly, the judgment resulting from an encounter with a particular service, wherein loyalty and satisfaction are interdependent on the very judgment. The present study is significant as it analyzes the service quality perceptions of airline passengers and links these perceptions to their satisfaction and loyalty levels. Additionally, this will enhance the scope of previous studies and has the potential to contribute much to the airline industry.
Aim and Objectives
The concept of customer satisfaction is inherent in all sorts of service industries and the act of providing quality in service is the cardinal rule that leads such industries to survive the ever-increasing competition. The industrial development during the past few decades has only extended more comfort and usability to the end-users, and their likings and patronage are analogous to the intensity of quality added package of service. Frequent monitoring of quality essentials is mandatory for the streamlining of airline services. This is required because the current analytical phases are rampant with wrong speculations and incompatible services that jeopardize the passenger’s expectations. Therefore, pragmatic and reliable research is necessary to give enlightenment about the conditions that affect the perception of the passengers which in turn tells upon their loyalty. To achieve the above outcome, the research paper focuses on the following aim and objectives:
Aim of the research
To analyze the service quality perceptions of Airline Passengers and to link these perceptions to their satisfaction and loyalty.
- To examine whether there is any inconsistency between consumer’s perceptions of service quality and the quality standards offered by the Airline industries.
- To affirm the necessity to maintain service quality standards by the airline industries to generate more satisfaction among the airline passengers.
Area of Study-Sources
This study diagnoses service quality perceptions of customers using different airline companies, especially those that are operated from Larnaca Airport (Greek site). The airline companies put to study here are (i) Cyprus Airways (ii) Austrian airlines (iii) Olympic Airlines (iv) Malev airlines (v) Lufthansa (vi) Chech airlines (vii) Easyjet (viii) Ryanair (ix) Etihad (x) Emirates, and (xi) British Airways. Most of the Cypriots avail the passenger service for leisure and business and are very sensitive to the quality of service rendered to them. A few other service-oriented industries are also selected for comparing the quality of service they generally provide in comparison to these airliners.
This research study compares the actual reported data (written standards) on service quality factors with the results of an exploratory questionnaire on customers’ perceptions. To meet the objectives of the research, it was decided to use a combination of both secondary and primary data as effective tools for data collection.
The primary means of investigation would be from the customer’s perspective, being answers to the questionnaire, as the consumers are the ideal persons to evaluate service quality as they are bound to be the direct receivers. To get maximum output from the target group, a group of passengers is randomly selected from the economy class. It is assumed that the Business class usually gets more quality service than the economy class. Hence their perception may be identical, whereas, those of economy class will be mixed. Secondary data will include various literature on the airlines and their service quality provisions. It also covers relevant academic review on service quality aspects.
Why is this study interesting?
The airline industry has a leading role to play in the travel and tourism industry of countries of the world. In Cyprus, due to its vantage location on the globe, the tourist arrivals are found to be comparatively higher than that of the neighboring countries. Therefore, the sample for this study is found, categorized, and centered at Larnaca airport of Cyprus and some of the flights that are operated from there, as it is impractical to focus the study at various airports and numerous airlines. In the wake of increasing competition and the acceleration in the service provisions, there is an urgent need for airline managers to recognize the importance of service management improvements. It is evident that service quality promotes customer satisfaction, and it stimulates the intention to return. Customer satisfaction increases profitability, market share, and return on investment. As such, airline managers have to find result-oriented and innovative ways to make their services stand out amongst the others. To achieve this, they must explicitly identify and prioritize service quality factors and then use the resultant information to manage customers’ expectations.
Structure of the Dissertation
To find out answers to the research questions and objectives several constituents relating to the airline industry and perceptions of passengers on service quality are keenly studied and analyzed in this research paper. The effectiveness of the quality of services and the loyalty of passengers are appraised with a critique’s mind and approach by comparing the different departments of services of the airlines. The study is thus compartmentalized and is brought under separate chapters including what is stated in the previous pages. The chapters conceived are:
100% original paper
written from scratch
specifically for you?
This chapter gives the background of the issue and leads to the specific elements that throw light on the outcome of the research paper.
The entire literature and other data accessed on the issue are reviewed under this chapter. This will enable the researcher to strengthen the grip over the topic towards answering the research question and achieving the objectives. With the proper review, the researcher can identify the areas to be tested as there may be gaps between the literature standards and the real-time application.
Under this chapter are detailed the application of research methods, description, and reasoning of such methods, including data collection and its modes. A brief analysis of the data collection procedure is also given here. For this study, both the qualitative and quantitative approaches are used meaningfully. The case study and survey methods are adopted to test the real and unique practices existing in the area of this research.
Findings & Discussion
Research findings are discussed in detail in this chapter about the content of the previous chapters. The results of the survey of passengers of various airline companies operated from Larnaca and the graphical presentation of survey findings are added and featured here.
An interpretation of the inherent problems and solutions to them are given in this chapter. The conclusion is drawn from the evidence elaborated in the previous chapters and indicates problems, if any, that have been identified.
The recommendation section delivers a few suggestions for the furtherance of the remedial measures to the discussed issues and also proposes some new programs and strategies for the development of the airline industry.
This chapter contains the evaluation of the research procedures and an account of limitations of the research study such as constraints encountered during the study process and how these were overcome to fulfill the research.
The success of businesses in general and service industries, in particular, are dependent on the satisfaction of the customers achieved through innovation and exploitation of pragmatic ideas relating to a service. The measuring of customer satisfaction in service businesses is largely determined by the perception of the customer on the service delivered. Therefore, the gap between the perception of customers and their expectation levels of a service denotes the amount of their satisfaction with the service and the service provider. Several types of research were conducted earlier and models like SERVQUAL were adopted to determine and narrow the gap between the customer’s perception and the actual service quality of an industry (Cauchick et al., n.d.). Responding promptly to the customers’ expectations with a positive gesture is what the customers expect from the service providers. The perception originated thereon, builds up the desired bond that leads to their loyalty (Hunt, n.d).
Since the quality of service is neither intangible nor quantifiable, the companies lean to certain parameters that can elucidate service quality attributes for evaluation and monitoring. It is evident that service quality is the basis to achieve success and overall efficiency, and therefore, it is vital for them to fulfill the customer’s expectations and lead them towards the required satisfaction level (Churchill, 1979). It is on this foundation that the service quality in airline companies is constructed, by which, the level of satisfaction acquired through the flight experience makes the customer return to the same airline afterward.
To evaluate the service quality of airlines, it is necessary to determine the key factors associated with the perceived quality of service from the consumer’s perspective. Of these, the elements that weigh more require prioritization while imparting innovation and improvement to the quality of service (Nadiri, Hussain, and Ekiz, n.d). The airlines used to monitor their service standards frequently, by implementing certain procedures and standards to avoid preferences on individual approach and uncertainties. There are always differences between the perception of an airline company management and that of the customers, and their expectations as well. When the gap between these perceptions of the two entities and the non-consummation of the customer’s expectations are at a minimal level, the customers tend to prefer certain airlines. There is enough proof available from the previous studies on service quality and customer satisfaction that preference, loyalty, and repurchase intentions are the result of customers’ perceptions of service quality and the satisfaction derived out of the previous experience of the same service (Carman, 1990; Legoherel, 1998; Singh, 1988; Smith et al., 1999; Zeithaml and Bitner, 2000).
Since satisfaction is considered purely as the umbrella concept and the given service quality relates to the particular service attributes (Nadiri et al., 2008) Word of Mouth communication (WOM) is also considered as contributive to customer perception and loyalty. Kau and Loh (2006, p. 103) demarcate WOM as “… the informal communication between consumers about the characteristics of a business or a product”. Schiffman and Kanuk (2004) affirm that WOM communication is very persuasive and effective. This literature review, hence, strives to identify and evaluate the factors that are critical in the service quality of airline companies and the customer’s perception of their services in general, with particular mention to the airline services that are operated from Larnaca Airport.
Necessity to maintain service quality to generate more satisfaction among the airline passengers
In a study conducted by Nick Johns and Antony Howard (1988), it was revealed that the customers used to construct service perceptions on certain generalized aspects of their expectation from the service provider, and accordingly have contributed the quality attributes to it, where the attributes were either elements that gave satisfaction or dissatisfaction. The study has inadvertently established that it is possible to gather and analyze the expectation and perception without prompting any pre-assumptions on their satisfaction levels. The outcome of the study applies not only to the tangible goods-producing industries but also to any other service industries including the airlines (Johns and Howard, 1998). Therefore, to become successful in the industry, airline companies must market their services effectively among the target groups by adding value to their service and at the same time avoiding chances of negative perception by the customers.
This has to be taken into account because the Air travel industry, driven by liberalization and globalization, continues to remain the fast-paced developing market. According to IATA (2007) report, it was estimated that over 2.1 billion passengers have undertaken air travel during the year 2006, which marked a growth rate of 5.9% than the previous year. The progress was achieved in the milieu of market liberalization, long-range and fuel-efficient airplanes to accommodate thinner air routes. This development convinced that improvement of service quality was essential to gain a better market share and greater financial achievement in domestic as well as international markets (Khan et al., n.d.)
Quality of service & customer perception – General concept
Quality of service is fundamental to get a competitive edge in achieving market leadership among service organizations. Therefore, it is imperative that they have to maintain a stable relationship with the customers. The ability of such organizations to retain a benefitting relationship with the customers is the result of long-term service superiority, and it becomes mandatory for the survival of any sort of service industry. And this, inter alia, is service devotion that promotes customer loyalty. It is true that loyal service gives an organization the advantage of an understanding of the present needs of the customers and instills in them the capability to anticipate their futuristic and long term needs, which in turn delights the customers to be responsive to offer sustained dedication and patronage.
In other words, while a service organization endeavors to earn its customer’s loyalty, the customers are found to be lenient to believe that the organization’s service allegiance is the commitment of delivery of superior service to them in real times of the present and that of the future. The primary aim of any of the service providers is identical to that of any of the tangible product manufacturers who yearn to satisfy their customers’ needs to reach economic survival. To facilitate this objective, every service provider must realize that long-term patronage of the customers is attained only by the evaluation of the rendered service and the preference they give for a particular service provider (Kandampully, 1998). It is so because a business is virtually run by the customers when their expectations are fulfilled by its management through the process of constant monitoring of their perception and enhancement of the service or the product, with quality orientation.
Services are something that a consumer buys and are not necessarily be tangible items. Kotler (2003) considers services on par with consumer goods as intangible, perishable, inseparable, and variable. Usually, services are offered along with some tangible items which are included in the form of a service package, but the very services are distinct from tangibles (Stevenson, 2009). These are consumed as soon as they are produced, and are quite different from the products or goods that people buy. Services do not allow any physical ownership of any of the service items, and on the contrary, the tangible products deliver physical ownership to the buyer (Render and Heizer, 2008). Moreover, the services bring satisfaction or satiation of the requirement of an individual, irrespective of whether it is hired or bought (Churchill, 1982). It is something that provides experience or skill set, or even it may be the required space to carry out a particular task. Service is thus referred to as an act or performance of an individual or an organization that involves interaction with the customer for initiating satisfaction and perception in them about its quality. For, it is the customer who rates and evaluates the quality of a service rather than a quality control system meant for a product of a manufacturing company (Avrikan, 1999).
According to (Parasuraman et al.,1991a), “Delivering superior quality of service has been recognized as the most effective means of ensuring that a company’s offerings stand out from a crowd of look-alike competitive offerings” (Parasuraman et al., 1991a). But Berry et al.(1988) regard service quality as a weapon by which many organizations lead. Whatever it is, the customers think that the deep relationship with a supplier is instrumental to the firm’s involvement whenever something goes wrong. This is an emotional bond that is evolved in the customer which is considered high in professional services such as medical and legal services. This relationship is developed through personal interaction by the employees of the service provider with the customer than its management personnel (Parkingston and Schineider, 1979).
About what is stated above, the service quality can be defined as the residual obtained, after the prudent comparison of service expectations and perceptions of the customer against the actual delivery of performance. It is ultimately a multidimensional concept (Parasuraman et al., 1985). The physical intangibility that is coherent with the supply of services and the continual non-standardized product added by the interactive production process, emphasizes the necessity of a certain perceived quality profile that fits any services. However, the term of perceived service quality is commonly understood as the variable between the expectations of the customer against the customer’s perceptions on performance (Carman, 1990).
Quality of service, customer satisfaction, and loyalty in the airline industry
Concepts and contrasts
Innovation is the keyword for the exploitation of new thinking styles, which is more applicable to service areas, especially to the airline passenger service. It is the common driver for quality and novelty to meet the challenges that face the industry. The introduction of new air routes and air carriers demand competition among the flight services, which in turn necessitates higher quality service output (Prayag and Dookhony-Ramphul, n.d.). Since airline passenger service is the total of new business models, the delivery of service, customer’s satisfaction and their perception together with the application of advanced technologies used to pave the way for innovation which is essential for the proper and prompt working of both the airports and the operating airlines (Huang, n.d.). While focusing on the delivery of quality service, any airline needs to improve its market share and enhance financial performance. To meet this end, there should be certain reliable measures that can lead to the understanding of the variables that tell upon the service quality based on the expectations and perceptions of the passengers (Khan et al., n.d.).
Khan and Dutt (2006) state that the winds of competition in the service industry have changed altogether in these times, and as a result, more and more middle-income people prefer to travel by air, after the airfare drop that augments service quality instead of the competition. But Parasuraman et al. (1985) counter this argument by stating that the mere reduction of fares cannot bring a competitive edge, whereas, it is the service quality that decides upon the competitive edge in marketing. Nevertheless, service quality is an indefinable intangible construct that is immeasurable within the given norms (Cronin et al., 2000). Therefore, it can be stated that service quality is the difference between the customer’s expectations and perception of the service delivered by the airline. If the expectations are greater than the performance, then it is clear that the perceived quality is less than satisfactory level and it results in customer dissatisfaction (Lewis and Mitchell, 1990).
The passengers evaluate the services of airlines based on their satisfaction relating to the in-flight service (Park et al., 2004). That means service quality in an airline is the perceived quality of service by the passengers (Garvin, 1984). But, according to Gronroos (1978), a service is not at all ambiguous and has different components such as technical and functional qualities, which when allowed interaction, brings out the overall quality. However, Parasuraman et al. (1985) after several previous studies have summarized service quality in three specific terms “first, service quality is more difficult for the consumer to evaluate than goods quality; second, service quality perceptions result from a comparison of consumer expectations with actual service performance; third, quality evaluations are not made solely on the outcome of a service, and they also involve evaluations of the process of service delivery.”
This statement is now widely accepted as the foundation of service quality, though there are two conceptualizations in this regard. The first one is the disconfirmation approach. The other one is the performance-only approach. The disconfirmation service quality model implies a situation where-in the overall expectation of the customer in the matter of service is surpassed by the service delivered, which impacts service quality. Due to this, service quality requires continuous refinements. Academically, the service quality which is based on SERVQUAL considers disconfirmation and other service attributes, to link them with management performance using a gap framework (Parasuraman et al., 1985).
The previous researchers accepted the disconfirmation model that assesses the gap between the expectations and perceptions of customers (Santos, 2003). In contrast, Parasuraman et al. (1985) adopted a stand that evaluation of service quality is founded on the gap that can evolve between the customer’s expectations and performance. Based on this approach, Parasuraman et al. (1988b) devised the multi-dimensional tool namely, SERVQUAL, for measuring service quality. SERVQUAL focuses on the principles of tangibles, responsiveness, reliability, assurance, and empathy, which are categorized as 22 scalable elements of expectations and performance. However, Carman (1990) questioned the validity of the above SERVQUAL principles and opined that these factors would not support any well-defined assessment of service quality and customer satisfaction and that these are inapplicable to all of the service industries until further modifications on it are made. Despite the strong criticism against it and contrasting observations from the proponents of the disconfirmation approach, SERVQUAL is still widely applied in most industries. Cronin and Taylor (1992) hold the view that the performance-based measurement of service quality can be treated as the advanced method of measuring the service quality concept.
Measurement of service quality
In this context, it is very important to take into account the different aspects of airline service for estimating the quality factor accurately. Chang (2003) regarded it as a service store based on Davis’s (1999) model that points to the four kinds of services that come under two task dimensions. The services offered by airline companies are made of fixed characteristics as well as flexible characteristics (Chang et al., 2003). The fixed ones are that relate to the airplane, size of seats, cargo storage, etc., whereas the flexible ones include the food service during the flight that consists of tangible and intangible elements. Airline customers become loyal to specific airlines due to these traits. Nevertheless, certain customers, though they are dissatisfied with the service quality continue to keep preference to some particular airline, considering the mileage programs incorporated in its service provisions (Jones et al., 2002). Additionally, the factors that tell upon transaction and switching cost will also determine the service loyalty (Lee and Cunningham 2001).
The debate on the gap between the quality of service and satisfaction has been tough but not irrefutable (Parasuraman et al., 1994). As per Zeithaml and Bitner (2000), the major difference between them is that the quality of service is causative to satisfaction, where quality denotes specific attributes of the service, and satisfaction is the surmounting entity. According to Nadiri et al. (2008), the concept of perceived service quality and the derived satisfaction level is purely constructed on the antecedent factors. However, quality is measured in terms of the gap and its directions towards perception as well as the expectation of the customers (Nadiri et. al., 2008).
Different service organizations may have likings to certain algorithms and techniques and they adopt them conveniently to understand the level of satisfaction of their customers (Barsky and Labagh, 1992). Though there are no fixed rules to measure it, certain aspects such as user-friendliness, robustness, sustainability, cost-effectiveness, reliability, and value orientation can lead to a certain extent in the determination of the quality of service. The importance to measure the service quality originates from the fact that the customers are the actual buyers of the service without whom the business will run no more. In the case of airlines, if the service quality is not up to the expectation of the customers, it will affect their quality perception, which in turn will thwart the prospects of the airlines. That is why it is vital to keep measuring and improving service quality.
How quality of service influences satisfaction and loyalty in airline passengers
Customers may have a higher level of expectation and they may return delighted if the service is delivered beyond it. From the marketing point of view, when the customers are inspired to attract to service it will elevate their expectation level. When the expectation level is increased and if the company fails to deliver the service to that level, the customer perception will become negative and it ultimately will destroy the business. The quality of service in the airline industry is more or less is influenced by flight safety, the appearance of the flight crew, frequency of flights, and comfort of the customers (Nejati and Shafae, 1984). Other factors that are involved in the quality, expectation, and satisfaction concepts are the airport facilities, hotels, food, and other tangibles (Khan, n.d).
For improving service quality, it is necessary to interact with employees frequently and appraise their service experiences. It is because an internal customer will also consider the service attributes of reliability and responsiveness in making a judgment of the service. By knowing the quality dimensions, a service organization can realize the quality of performance of both the employees and managers.
Quality of service-stipulations and benefits to passengers
The air transport system, accelerated by the rise of the single market concept has caused dissatisfaction today due to the shortcomings in the quality output of the airlines. Despite several steps taken hitherto at the community level, the passengers are still not aware of the compensation facilities against denied boarding, accident liabilities, nonadherence to the code of conduct for reservation systems and travel packages. This has propelled the European commission to launch campaigns stipulating the charter of passenger rights in all of the European airports by community laws and legislative Acts. The operating airlines are supposed to make voluntary commitments to practice it, without jeopardizing competition and cooperation among them. Future legislation will guarantee more rights to airline passengers so that they could settle the disputes at the earliest and are well informed about the performance of the airlines to enable selections. This is because the ways the complaints are addressed by the airlines are very discouraging [Protection of air passengers-COM (2000) 365].
The Commission is intending to make new legislation and voluntary commitments on the part of airlines to make it easy for the delayed passengers to continue their travel by the reimbursement of the ticket cost or providing alternative flights immediately. It will strive to set up certain requirements to favor the passengers in executing travel contracts to enlighten them about the services offered by the airlines. Additionally, it will institute voluntary obligation for the airlines to improve the service quality such as low travel fare, better cabin conditions for passenger’s health, access to information, easy complaint lodging and redressing procedures, care for delayed passengers, and settlement of disputes without court interventions [Protection of air passengers-COM (2000) 365].
The Skytrax Product and Service benchmarking which was introduced in the year 1989, also strives to keep the better quality of service, maintenance of good management practices, employee-management-passenger interaction and relationship, and advancement of customer satisfaction through effective management. Skytrax evaluates the competitive strengths and drawbacks of airlines in the matter of products and services, safety and security, better service features, and eradication of degraded service practices. It also conceives plans to improve and impart high satisfaction levels among passengers (Airline Product and Service Benchmarking). Because of these measures, the airliners are forced to implement new strategies to promote low-cost carriers, higher service quality, adherence to scheduled timings, and cheaper travel fares (Dostaler and Flouris,n.d.).
Factors that influence the customers’ Loyalty
Previous studies conducted on service quality and loyalty factors in the airline industry have evidenced that customer’s perception is influenced by the quality in the service provisions of catering service, seat cleanliness, hygienic cabin conditions, the comfort level of the passengers, air conditioning inside the cabin, cleanliness of the toilets, reliability of security control room, effective sign system, availability of trolleys in the airport, employees’ attitude towards customers, flawless reservations, access and carrying of tangible items in the journey, flight frequencies, soothing waiting area environment, etc. According to Hussain and Ekiz (n.d.) of the Eastern Mediterranean University and school of Hotel and Tourism Management, the most important and significant factors that contribute to the satisfaction of the customers and their loyalty are the tangible items provided by the airline company. This indicates that along with various other factors, the tangible items which are served during the in-flight service add to the customer’s perception, and the quality level of the service is assessed by them on this basis (Hussain and Ekiz, n.d.).
In addition to what is stated above, the other elements that extend the quality perception and loyalty are the responsiveness of the service during traveling, convenient and streamlined reservation facilities, empathy towards the consumers, reliability of the service, and assurance of better safety to the customers. This is vital as the business profitability and economy relate directly to customer satisfaction and loyalty towards the airline companies. In the case of the prestige class, there are six decisive service quality factors, and they are alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverage, responsiveness and empathy, reliability, assurance, presentation style, and quality of food, while the economy class showed five important service quality factors, and they are responsiveness and empathy, food quality, alcoholic beverage, non-alcoholic beverage and reliability (Hussain and Ekiz, n.d.).
In this connection, it has to be mentioned that there exist considerable differences between the service quality provided by major and regional airlines. Regional airlines are worse in offering service quality in all relevant fields. Therefore, it is essential to analyze the welfare aspects of passengers and how it varies from one airline to another, and how the consumers reflect on it.
Since the recognition of service quality in the airlines is tougher than that of other service industries, flawless coordination of the various activities by the organization is required for the betterment of airline service quality. Interactive approaches to customers and personalization will derive perceived service quality through the satisfaction of the customers. Unanticipated delays will cause strong resentment in customers and it will reflect as negation in their satisfaction level. In the case of in-flight services, the major evaluation element lies in the in-flight meal service as it provides more time in interacting directly with the passengers. As such it is necessary to plan the in-flight meal service effectively so that it will satisfy their expectation (An and Noh, 2009).
Customer’s perceptions of service quality
The service level during the travel time greatly influences the customer’s perception as they focus much on the journey attributes rather than their daily chores. Quality of food, beverages, seats, comfortable sitting arrangements, responsiveness, safety assurance, individual attention, and presentation style are the key factors that elevate the customer’s perception of service quality. The airline company must analyze the present level of satisfaction and perception by the customers to prioritize the areas that need improvement. As customers are attracted only through the delivery of high-quality service, the airline company needs to become competitive in the challenging market (Goliath, 2006).
Many studies have been conducted to determine the relationship between what the management counts as service parameters and what the customers perceive. The Gap model proposed by Parasuraman et al. (1985) and the subsequent SERVQUAL or the RATER model, being an acronym of Reliability, Assurance, Tangibles, Empathy and Responsiveness, are useful measures to judge the service quality and customer perception (Babakus and Mangold, 1992). To understand the customer’s perception, the management must realize the levels of customer expectations and their fulfillment. Customer satisfaction level can be categorized as (i) Desired service (what customers expect) (ii) Adequate service (the minimum level of service by which a customer can be satisfied) (iii) Predicted service (the anticipated level of service based on experience), and (iv) Zone of tolerance (the threshold level a customer may accept service).
SERVQUAL scale, which is the most widely used tool to decide the level of service quality and its monitoring (Carman, 1990) gives a company proper awareness about the level of the customer’s expectation and perception of the service quality to support companies to identify the improvement areas. This involves coping up with the customer’s expectation about the service and giving them what they want at a minimal cost. A customer’s perception would become positive only if the services rendered by the airline company meets or exceeds the customer’s expectations about the quality of the service provided (White and Galbraith, 2000).
Earlier studies have proved that the airline industry bears several cultural factors rather than a set of perceived factors (Ling, Lin, and Lu, 2005). The company must look into every step of service starting from the reservation department to the telephone ticketing and from baggage handling to the cabin crew. Then only it could contribute to the building up of the customer’s perception about the service rendered, and that needs to be done through monitoring, standardization, proper control, and procedures. Likewise, for prioritizing, there are other models in research such as Multiple Criteria Decision Making or MCDM that uses techniques to prioritize the factors that influence the perception of service quality by the customer (Nejati, Nejati, and Shafae, 1984). By utilizing these models and research studies, the airline industry can reach the point where customer perception is clear to the management for identifying and prioritizing the areas where improvement gave can enhance the customer perception of the service quality.
Inconsistency between consumer’s perceptions of service quality & and the quality standards offered by Airline industries: Review of passengers
Given below are a few reviews/reports posted by certain passengers on the message boards of various websites after availing the services of some airlines, which are pointers to the inconsistencies between the standards offered by the companies and what is received by the customers. These reviews and complaints reflect their satisfaction level on the service quality received, and show how it impacts upon their perception that leads to their corresponding loyalty to the airlines.
According to Edwards (2010), the check-in was quick, but the bag drop took 3-4 minutes queuing and the staff ignored the extra weight in the hold baggage. The boarding place was only 3 minutes walk from the central shopping area. The service was quick and efficient. The aircraft was clean, but not up to the pristine standards that are seen in the Asian airlines. The cleanliness and appearance were below the level of Lufthansa. The seats were covered with leather and were clean, but showed signs of wear, and headrest pads did not function at all. The complimentary beverages were tea, coffee, and wine (options: cold or hot), and these were served with a sweet or savory snack. The cheese supplied was disgusting. However, considering the low fare, a passenger could not expect more than that, during the entire flight length. Entertainment facilities were very poor, for they could have at least provided some newspapers for self-service at the boarding gate.
The cabin staff did not greet at the main door at the time of boarding. There was only one service cart that took more than 25 minutes to appear for delivering the beverages. The staff cleared the waste only after 45 minutes. Though the staff was not rude, they never took the pain to have any interaction with the passengers and did not show any courtesy. On flight arrival, the baggage handling was horrible, and it took 35 minutes to appear Bite (2011) states: “Heathrow to Larnaca. FA’s always efficient, meals good, apart from curry on our return flight. 767 seats, a little worn, but enough legroom for a short-haul. Female pilot on the return journey, very informative.”
According to a Cyprus news report, the Cyprus airline’s inspectors have discovered that the company’s catering services had been serving only sub-standard meals (Cyprus Airways Catering Under Scrutiny). Loannou, (2011) after availing the service of Cyprus airways reviews, “Take off on time, service good, food ok, seat pitch suitable and aircraft was clean. The cabin crew was friendly and helpful. A family with a child asked if they could sit in row 4 and they accepted it along with my request to sit in row 5.” But another passenger from the UK perceived the service quality, just opposite. He reported that the Aircraft was clean, and took off at 5 AM. The crew served breakfast to a full cabin, cleared the tables, and disappeared only to appear again not long before landing. He could not turn down a hot breakfast, but this one he let go due to its poor standard. IFE was limited to a very short documentary and was closed much before landing. It was sad for an airline of a country that has hospitality as the main industry.
Jillot (2011) commented that there was not much legroom. The food was good, but the staff was not friendly; though they were not rude, and provided extra drinks. However, these good aspects did let down by the service received before the flight at the call point. According to Jillot (2011), “There was a problem reissuing the ticket after a change – this would not have been a major issue if it had been resolved when I first called a week before the flight, but I was still chasing the reissued ticket on the day of the flight (not having it meant I couldn’t check-in online) 4 different people tied to fix it and gave me wrong info until eventually, someone realized what the problem was and I was able to check-in. However the next flight from DBX-SIN I had the same problem and had to check in with the huge queue. These wasted phone calls irritated me and costing me money for about 1.5 hours on the phone. Wouldn’t choose Emirates again”.
Chappers, D (2011), in his Review of Easy Jet writes, “We flew with Easyjet from Alicante to Gatwick and then to Dalaman and Gatwick to Alicante. All our flights were on time and the service was very good. We were lucky, none of the flights were fully booked, and so we had plenty of room. Without a doubt, they are the best charter airline we have flown with. Will book with them next year…”
According to Carr (2008), “Olympic employees truly seem to take a delight in keeping the passengers in the dark. When we arrived at check-in for the 30-minute flight to Athens, the Olympic flight didn’t even appear on the departures screen……. Did it not occur to a single OA employee to even walk over to the departures lounge to give the 29 of us a verbal update? Are the passengers that worthless to this airline?”
Barnes (2002) commented that the service was cool, efficient, and comfortable. He says, “Let me begin by saying that Lufthansa is one of the most efficient airlines I have ever seen…Their way of doing things ought to be mimicked by more airlines. If this were so, the flying public would be a happier lot, to be sure” Barnes (2002).
As per Dirnberger (2011), the quality of service was excellent with friendly flight attendants serving water, soft drinks, and iced tea frequently. The in-flight food was good, and so was the entertainment, it showed the latest films. But the seat pitch was not up to the mark.
Role of Word of mouth communication (WOMC) in consumer perception leading to satisfaction and loyalty to airlines
Word of mouth communication (WOMC) is significant in service industries. It is a highly influential and effective mode of communication in developing a positive response to the service offered by a company. Therefore, the companies must realize its importance and strive to create WOMC intentions in the customers. Laczniak, DeCarlo, and Ramaswami (2001) state, “It is an important market place phenomenon by which consumers receive information relating to organizations and their offerings”. Since WOMC develops through reliable sources that the consumers know, they will tend to believe the service is credible. That is why it is considered as a more powerful decisive force to modulate the consumer’s lenience to a particular service. It has a major role in the service context because of its predominant nature in the matter of experience and credibility. It suggests that a consumer’s experience with a service or a product has an increased level of perceived risk in effecting a purchase.
Loyalty, satisfaction, and patronage
Several previous studies made by researchers like Mittal and Kamakura (2001); Lam et al. (2004) on service quality, satisfaction, and loyalty have shown that satisfaction of the customer affects certain variables that denote loyalty or orientation and patronage toward a long-term relationship. They state that a satisfied customer’s liking to a specific service provider will motivate another customer to go for the service provider, and that customer too will do the same thing to other prospective customers.
Heskett et al. (1997) suggested that customer loyalty would rise quickly after customer satisfaction passes through a particular threshold. That means there is an increase in the scale of the relationship between customer loyalty and satisfaction. Thus, satisfaction is defined and valued as the sense of the customer that the consumption will cause a standard of pleasure against displeasure. On the other hand, service quality is something regarded in the research literature as an exceptional construct that is derived out of customer satisfaction.
Linking of customer perceptions to their satisfaction and loyalty
According to Gordon (1993), the present standard of perceived service quality has only less potential and loyalty of the customer which is not up to the satisfactory level. There is a significant relationship between service quality and retained preference which can be considered as a yardstick for customer loyalty. The research findings hitherto evidence that the repeat purchase or retained preference and loyalty are an effective step to identify a loyal passenger. There exist certain bi-dimensional matrixes that can be treated as the four kinds of loyalties such as, true, spurious, latent, and low.
These four types of loyalties are in existence in a series of service settings. These attributes can become instrumental to identify the real loyal customers, who are highly satisfied with the services that extend empathy and care to them. Generally, wealthy and high profile society people look for only higher quality service and as such, they are more sensitive to quality perceptions (Gordon, 1993). It is service quality that stimulates perception that leads to satisfaction and loyalty (Nadiri and Hussain, 2005). Such perceptions of the customers relating to priorities and service frequencies will become decisive in their satisfaction level which accounts for their loyalty to an airline (An & Noh, 2009).
Review of the Research Problems
This chapter deals with the research design and procedures adopted in conducting the study. It gives a clear understanding of the methodological choices made and the links between the purpose and research questions. The different aspects of the service quality perceptions of Airline Passengers are analyzed to associate them with their satisfaction and loyalty. Such an analysis will determine the inconsistency between consumers’ perceptions of service quality as well as the quality standards offered by Airline industries. It will also affirm the necessity to maintain service quality standards by the airline industries to generate more satisfaction among the passengers.
The literature review in the previous chapter has provided a foundation for the study by focusing on past research and studies that have been conducted on customer perception of service quality in the service industry. Accordingly, the service quality is measured by the tangibility of the consumer’s surroundings which is represented by objects or subjects, the reliability of the service provider, their involvement and interaction, the assurance that the customer will get a wide range of services, and the readiness of the company to provide the customer with individualized services (Nadiri et al., 2005). The measurement of the various aspects of service quality in the airline industry involves analyzing the airline tangibles like cleanliness inside the airplanes, the airport, and the terminal’s facilities. Service quality was also measured in terms of the readiness of the airline staff to help customers, the punctuality of the airline, the availability of health care facilities in the airport, and the care of passenger luggage.
In this research, the sample of the study consists of customers who use the various airline companies that are operated through Larnaca Airport in Cyprus. The non-probability sampling technique is applied here to identify the samples of the population. Some of the most common methods in non-probability sampling include snowball sampling, purposive or judgmental sampling, quota sampling, and reliance on available subjects. For this study, the nonprobability technique used to sample the population will be the judgmental sampling of passengers in the airport (Babbie, 2008).
The type of data collection technique that is incorporated denotes the use of questionnaires (Appendix B) distributed to passengers of the various airlines. It is beneficial when the sample population is large in number. Questionnaires provide a detailed explanation of the various aspects that are under study. When the questionnaires are self-administered, the passengers will be encouraged to fill them out based on their general perception of the airline’s service quality. The items in the questionnaire will measure the dimensions of the SERVQUAL scale which is also known as the RATER scale. The dimensions of the RATER scale include reliability, assurance, tangibles (airline tangibles, terminal tangibles, and image and personnel tangibles), empathy, and responsiveness. The SERVQUAL scale developed by Parasuraman et al. (1988) was designed to address the gaps or inconsistencies that existed between customers’ expectations of service quality and their perceptions of the actual performance of the service.
The items in the questionnaire will therefore measure the reliability of the airline industry as well as the assurance that exists within the different airlines. The questionnaire will also cover tangibles like airline tangibles under the SERVQUAL scale such as the cleanliness of the aircraft, quality of food provided in the plane, cleanliness inside the planes including toilet seats, and quality of air-conditioning within the planes. From the questionnaires, terminal tangibles like the cleanliness of the airport’s toilets, number of shops in the airport, availability of parking space as well as the comfort of waiting lounges in the airport, level of air conditioning within the airport and smoking areas, availability of trolleys and number of passengers that the airport can hold at a given time can be assessed (Parasuraman et al., 1988).
The questionnaire will also measure other tangibles that are related to personnel within the airport that reflect the general attitude and responsiveness of airport and airline staff, the level of personnel care accorded to every passenger, the level of personal attention extended to the passengers by the airline personnel, etc. It will also reveal the level of training and experience that the employees have, awareness of airport duties, and the standard of error-free reservations and transactions. Another item that can be measured will be the punctuality of flight arrivals, departures, and transportation to the airport (Nadiri et al., 2008).
Along with this, the compensation schemes available to passengers, the care of passenger’s luggage, the number of flights available to passengers, and the locations of airline offices within and outside the airport, and the availability of health care services during the flight are also measurable. The questionnaire will also include an image item that provides the general perception a customer has about the image of the airline, the low ticker price availability, and the consistency of airline ticket prices. It will also project a customer satisfaction item that can give an account of the satisfaction level of the customer acquired from the airline (Nadiri et al., 2008).
The questionnaire will deal with the loyalty of airline passengers by analyzing repurchase intentions. The responsiveness part of the SERVQUAL scale will also be measured from the questionnaire to ascertain whether the airline industry is responding promptly to its customer’s needs. Each item in the questionnaire will be measured by a five-point Likert scale where the scale items, reliabilities, and corrected item-total correlations will be used to analyze the results of the questionnaire. Moreover, through the questionnaire, the consumers will rank the service quality factors according to their priorities.
The SERVQUAL scale is suitable for this study as it measures the behavioral intentions of airlines and airline passengers by measuring customer satisfaction and the service quality dimensions that are included in the RATER scale (Parasuraman et al., 1988). Considering Parasuraman et al.’s study on airline service quality and customer perceptions, several hypotheses for the study can be developed. The first hypothesis H1, based on the SERVQUAL scale is: “a high level of perceived reliability related to service quality will have a positive effect on customer satisfaction.” (Nadiri et al., 2008).
Another hypothesis that can be derived from the SERVQUAL scale is H2, which is “a high level of perceived assurance related to service quality will lead to a positive effect on customer satisfaction”. With regards to tangibles on the SERVQUAL scale, the hypothesis is H3, which is: “a high level of perceived tangibles related to quality and it has a significant impact on customer satisfaction”. Hypothesis four (H4) is related to customer empathy and it is: “a high level of perceived empathy related to service quality will have a significant effect on customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions” (Nadiri et al., 2008).
The hypothesis that will be used to reflect the responsiveness of the airline industry in the SERVQUAL scale is: “a high level of perceived responsiveness will have a significant positive effect on customer satisfaction”. After the questionnaires have been filled, the study dimensions within the questionnaire will reflect the hypothesized relationships. The diagram below (Fig-1) represents service quality dimensions of the SERVQUAL scale measured by airline tangibles (ATANG), terminal tangibles (TTANG), personnel (PER), empathy (EMP), an image (IMG) as well as their link with the hypothesized relationships within the study. The dimensions are represented by circles which demonstrate the independent and dependent variables of the study. The hypotheses demonstrated by the arrows are used to measure both customer satisfaction with the airlines operated through Larnaca airport, and their repurchase intentions (Nadiri et al., 2008).
Primary and Secondary Research Data
Research data can be collected from either primary sources of information or secondary sources of data. Primary data refers to information that has been collected by the researcher that has not been subjected to any forms of processing or manipulation. Primary data which is also known as raw data is the information that the researcher gathers while conducting the research. Raw data is usually generated from experimentation and field studies, from where the researcher collects information that has not been previously collected by other researchers. For primary data to become information, it has to undergo selective extraction and analysis to ensure that it is suitable for presentation (Thyer, 2010).
Secondary data is information that has been collected by someone else, apart from the user of the research. The most commonly used resources of secondary data comprise surveys, questionnaires, census results, academic journals, articles, books, government records, and data collected via qualitative or quantitative research. Secondary data is the most preferred source of data collection as it ensures that the researcher saves time while collecting the relevant information that pertains to the study. It also ensures that less time is spent in collecting quantitative data which requires the development of higher quality databases to capture quantitative information (Thyer, 2010).
The source of secondary data in quantitative research is from censuses, surveys, and government statistics. The source of secondary data in qualitative research is derived from structured or non-structured interviews, observation, questionnaires, and focus groups (Thyer, 2010). The type of data collection method for this study will be secondary data sources such as journals, articles, websites, textbooks, statistics, reports, and surveys that contain qualitative and quantitative information based on previous studies and research work conducted on service quality and customer satisfaction with particular focus on the airline industry. The use of secondary data will be important to the study as it will save time. It will also ensure that the research has a strong theoretical background and framework based on previous research and theories.
Research Design and Data Analysis Techniques
The purpose of a research design is to determine whether the research questions of the study can be transformed into testable hypotheses. In selecting the most suitable research design, the researcher first assesses the research questions of the study. Once the research questions have been developed, the researcher has the option of selecting various research methods to structure the research suitably. The most commonly used research designs include experimental designs, non-experimental designs, and quasi-experimental research designs. The experimental research design involves the researcher actively trying to change the circumstances of the research, while the non-experimental research design involves the research study of two natural groups that are under conditions or circumstances that have not been manipulated (Creswell, 2003).
The quasi-experiment research design is an observational study that is conducted on the subjects of a study who have not been randomly assigned to the groups that are under study. In a quasi-experiment, people would be grouped according to the categories in which they fit in. The research design that will be used for this study will be the non-experimental research design as it ensures that the circumstances or conditions of the aspects or subjects that are under study have not been manipulated or changed in any way. The non-experimental design ensures that a range of dependent and independent variables can be measured by the researcher during the study such as the various dimensions of the SERVQUAL scale and the customer perception of service quality in airlines (Creswell, 2003).
The data analysis technique will analyze the qualitative information within the research. It provides a constant comparison or grounded theory assessment of the secondary data sources to determine whether any indicators exist that can explain the inconsistencies or differences in customer perceptions and service quality. With the constant comparison method, the theoretical frameworks and conceptual backgrounds that exist in various research works that have been conducted on the topic can be ascertained. That gives the ability to the researcher to compare the works of other researchers about the airline industry (Ratcliff, 2011).
For analyzing the qualitative information that has been collected in the study, the most suitable data analysis method to analyze the statistical measurements derived from the Likert scale will be the SPSS computer program. This program provides a descriptive analysis of the standard deviations and frequencies that have been calculated for the five dimensions of the SERVQUAL scale including airline tangibles, personnel, and empathy, image, and terminal tangibles. The psychometric properties of the collected data will also be measured based on reliability, convergence, and dimensionality.
The populace structure for this research was determined by sampling the customers who have taken flight from the Larnaca Airport during the last twelve months. Additionally, some specific reflections of passengers for certain previous periods were also selected randomly to ascertain the progress of the management strategy in the promotion of service quality to increase the perception of the customers on the service rendered. The descriptions of the sampling structure are in line with the propositions of Carman (1990) based on the recentness of the service understanding to get improved info on anticipation and perception degrees. Records of sales statistics from the airline offices exposed that passengers could be sorted into three classes:
- students moving for studies
- tourers locomoting for holiday purposes, and
- travel agents commuting for educational purposes.
A blend of qualitative and quantitative research was utilized to measure the expectations and perceptions of passengers. The qualitative method required three paired in-depth interviews with loyal airline customers who had been on holiday to Cyprus in the last twelve months. These passengers stated that the workforce of the airline, that is, the in-flight service by cabin crew has added greatly to their optimistic perceptions of good service provided by the airlines. According to one interviewee, “the airline differentiates itself from the competition, SAA, based on its physical facilities, color combination for its cabin, employee’s willingness to help”. On the other hand, another respondent remarked that “boarding must be hassle-free; employees must be consistent in service delivery, poor on-time performance”.
Three travel brokers that had of late been involved in marketing the airline to international tourists were questioned. They had been on informative tours to Cyprus in the last twelve months. They were of the view that the airline’s welcoming staff, attention to particulars, good road development, in-flight service, and great quality perception of the destination have added to perceptions of high service levels. On the other hand, technical troubles with the aircraft, poor on-time functioning, criticisms about pre-flight processes were the major areas of anxiety. They found that training of workers would greatly add to the airline rendering a world-beating service. So far as the student population was concerned, three of them were questioned. They pointed out that they were very pleased with the service rendered. They had no objections on pre-flight procedures but they remarked discontentment with food range, in-flight amusement, and high fares.
The result as mentioned above over and above the literature on SERVQUAL was applied to devise the survey tool, which comprised of three parts. Section A included the 22 SERVQUAL batteries of expectation and perception statements. The 22 arguments have been established to be pretty good predictors of service quality in its totality (Sureschandar et al., 2001). The SERVQUAL arguments were all formulated optimistically as recommended by Babakus and Boller (1992). A five-point Likert scale as an alternative to seven was applied to cut down the dissatisfaction degree of respondents and augment reaction rate and quality (Babakus and Mangold, 1992; Krosnick and Fabrigar, 1997; Johns et al., 2004; Jain and Gupta, 2004). Section B covered precise properties that customers linked with the airlines. The concluding section dealt with questions relating to demographic and flying conventions. For the quantitative study, a non-probability process was applied to gather the data from riders. An inconsistent quota sampling was applied due to the subsistence of three separate sub-groups of passengers that regularly travels by airline, namely; students, tourists, and travel agents.
The survey gadget was pilot examined with the responders for the qualitative study. No more than one trivial problem was observed about the phrasing of questions. The required corrections were made. A sample size of 100 was held to be suitable for the investigative nature of the study. Alike surveys on service quality have utilized sample sizes that diverge from 62 (Llosa et al., 1998), 105 (Cunningham et al., 2002), 162 (Nel et al., 1997) to 450 (Ling et al., 2005). Held that the mainstream of passengers was international tourists, the allocation for this sub-group was fixed at 30 respondents, 15 each for the sub-group travel agents and students. Data collection was spread over six weeks using face-to-face interviews. On the whole, the reaction rate was 99.1%, since a travel broker did not fill out the survey tool due to time restraints.
Data Collection and Analysis
Explorative questionnaires were administered to a sample of 200 respondents representing consumers of different airline services. They were passengers who travel across these airlines during a specific period. Their opinions were sought about the specific objectives of the study. The two main objectives are:
- To examine whether there is an inconsistency between consumer’s perceptions of service quality and the quality of standards offered by the airline industries.
- To affirm the necessity to maintain service quality standards by the airline industries to generate more satisfaction among the airline passengers
Reliability and Dependability
In line with the first objective, respondents were questioned about the reliability and dependability of the airlines. Out of the 200 respondents interviewed, 98 passengers showed their dissatisfaction in connection with reliability and dependability. Though they represent only 49% of the sample, their perception of the rendered service quality reflects their satisfaction level, and as such their perception affects their loyalty to the respective service provider. This indicates that the service quality of the airline industry needs revamping. 96 out of the 200 respondents felt that the quality of service provided by the airline industry was good and this represented 48% of the sample. About 6 respondents did not commit themselves to their opinions about dependability and reliability. This denotes that there are technical hitches in the organizational structures of the airline industry due to which the industry, on the whole, has attracted significant negative reactions from the customers.
Related to the question of reliability, other aspects of quality service are privilege and comfort. The discontentment of the respondents appeared to have been anchored on poor communication about schedule changes and alterations. Such discontentment tells upon their level of satisfaction and that affects their perception negatively.
Quality of Service
The study also sought the respondents’ opinions on whether they thought service quality factors of the airline industry were in line with consumer expectations. They were asked to give their views on the question of service quality and only 1.5 % of the sample thought the services were of excellent quality. Respondents who thought the services were poor, formed 3.5 % of the entire sample. Another 2.5 % of the respondents felt that the services were very poor. Those who rated the service quality as superb represented 4 % of the entire population. However, 88.5 % of these respondents argued that the quality of services of the airline industry was moderately good.
The general analysis of the results shows that majority of the respondents had a feeling that the services extended to them were of average quality and that there was inconsistency in their perception levels. It can be pointed out that those who felt the service were average may be the loyalists and the optimistic ones who have developed some sort of cultural attachment towards certain companies that operate in the industry. Their support may be due to the positive attributes they experience, which in turn determines their loyalty.
The loyalty factor of a specific category of clientele is sometimes formed out of different reasons and objectives, and not because of the commercial value of the product (Churchill, 1982; Vavra, 1997). A few who rated the airline’s services as very good have attributed the reasons to comfort, cost, and convenience. Most of these were domestic travelers, especially holiday makers traveling in the country. This group mostly consists of elderly couples and pensioners who use the services mainly during the festive seasons. The working class, foreign tourists, business people, and students forming 70% of the sample felt that they were not at all happy with the services provided by the airline industry.
Their disapproval was due to flight delays, flight cancellations, and mishandling of luggage. But at the same time, 68% of this group felt that the services could be improved by bringing in policy innovations in the airline industry. These findings reveal that the airline industry still wants much advancement in its approach to service quality provisions to create more satisfaction among the customers. Such an approach to the quality of rendered service will promote their perception level to favor them in terms of loyalty. Studies have established that in the present times of fierce competition, companies that do not come up with quick consumer-friendly initiatives usually get an advantage over those that stagnate in this area of performance reforms (Churchill, 1982).
Analysis of the Findings
The data was encrypted and tabulated to analyze them. Table-1 shows the demographic profile of respondents. It can be seen from the table that the sample polled more females than males, an older target market, and a majority of students. The respondents’ average monthly household income was more than €1033.
Table 1: Sample Characteristics of Respondents.
The next step of the analysis was to find out how well the SERVQUAL model displayed service quality when used in an airline services setting. The scales were supposed to have a five-dimensional arrangement (Robledo, 2001). Individual measurements were submitted to service quality analysis by their anticipated proportions. The factors of service quality reliability coefficients (Cronbach alpha), relating to the different service proportions were then calculated individually for the five dimensions on the raw SERVQUAL scores. Accordingly, Table- 2 provides all of the reliable proportions, with larger than 0.7 alpha values. The service quality reliability coefficients are more or less parallel with research conducted previously in the airline industry (Nel et al., 1997).
Table 2: Dimensions Cronbach Alphas.
|Dimensions||Item coefficient (alphas)||Service Quality Reliability item alpha||Standardized|
|Total scale reliability||22||0.927932||0.933913|
Earlier studies (Cunningham et al., 2002) of service quality have concentrated on applying procedures like regression analysis and factor analysis to appraise customers’ expectations and perceptions. But in this study, the researcher has used cluster analysis to group respondents that are established on differing anticipations and perceptions. Cluster analysis assumes unidentified group memberships of objectives and goes forward to disconnect the objects into discrete groupings, each having its individuality (Aaker et al., 1998). This technique permits the placement of respondents in different groups based on their service quality perceptions and expectations. Therefore, the supposition of inconsistency between consumer’s perceptions on service quality and the quality of standards offered by the airline industries was looked into using cluster analysis.
A k-means grouping process was undertaken on customers’ expectations of service levels. The rationale of clustering customers based on service expectations was to make out identical groups of respondents established on a similarity of reactions. In general, the k-means technique will create precisely k different clusters of maximum potential difference (Churchill, 1995). Computationally, this technique is denoted as an analysis of variance (ANOVA) “in reverse.” The algorithm begins with k random clusters and then moves objects among those clusters to initially reduce unpredictability inside clusters and secondly to maximize variability amongst clusters.
This is corresponding to “ANOVA in reverse” since the significance test in ANOVA measures between the group’s unpredictability adjacent to the within-group variability while calculating the significance test for the hypothesis that the averages in the clusters differ from each other. In k-means grouping, the algorithm attempts to shift objects, like respondents in and out of clusters to get the most considerable ANOVA results. The study was forced a priori to three clusters initially, which ensued in one cluster comprising only one responder. Accordingly, the investigation was run once more to make the most of the original in-between clusters but controlled to keying out only two groups. Cluster 1 contained 89 responders and 119 respondents made up cluster 2. Below is a graph which shows the plot of means (Figure 4).
A close examination of the vivid statistics of each group exposed that Cluster 1 consists of respondents who were on average unconcerned to whether airlines should, for instance, execute the service correctly the first time. Figure 4 shows that anticipations incline to differ much in group one for each of the SERVQUAL expectations statements where, EXPECT3 for instance, refers to anticipations of 3rd statement in the SERVQUAL sequence of statements. It can also be inferred that respondents on regular consent that airline should accomplish their guarantees and must demonstrate a genuine interest in figuring out customer troubles. Passengers should feel safe when they are interacting with the company. Riders on average ranked all other SERVQUAL anticipation statements as unconcerned. For Cluster 2, the stratagem of means depicts constancy in ratings of anticipation statements, that is, on average most responders accorded to what the statements said.
The same process was followed for the perception statements. The k-means was controlled a priori to three clusters.
From Figure 5, we can figure out that Cluster 1 constitutes 30 respondents who on average roughly differ with the airline industry rendering eminent service quality across all five-service proportions. This group can be identified as riders who sensed service quality to be ‘Poor’. 55 respondents fall under Cluster 2 and they on average are unconcerned about the service rendered by the Airline industry. This group is ‘Indifferent’ to service quality. Cluster 3 includes 70 respondents who comparatively agree that the Airline industry provides high quality of service. This group is called ‘Good’ service quality. For Cluster 3, riders on average ranked perception statement 19, meaning that some flights in the Airline industry have suitable flight agendas, differently. They are unbiased to that argument. The expedient schedule appears to be trouble across all of the three groups as revealed by the relative intimacy of means for that variable quantity.
The next part of the analysis was to cluster the untreated SERVQUAL score differences. The P-E score was calculated and grouped with a priori three clusters. The cluster clarification established that one cluster comprised of only one respondent. Subsequently, the investigation was run once more with a two-cluster key. The figure supra depicts that there are service quality shortages on all five-service proportions. An optimistic mean in Figure 6 suggests that perceptions were more effective than expectations. The SERVQUAL score for group 1 is encouraging for only one statement referring to the tangibles proportion, that is, responders perceive that Airline industries are equipped with the latest equipment.
On service measurement consistency, answerers from both Cluster 1 and Cluster 2 remark that there are important service quality underperformances. The same enforces for service dimensions reactivity, confidence, and empathy. It must be noticed that the statement that the Airline industry has suitable flight schedules is a challenging one, as revealed by the service quality score (SQ19). A chi-square test of affiliation disclosed that there is a substantial connection between groupings and sub-groupings of responders in the sample frame (p-level = 0.00157). Out of those who comprehend service quality shortages on all service proportions are students who form 53.3% of the sample. As a result, the opening point for service betterments in the airline industry needs concentration on the reliability proportion. This indicates the necessity to improve the quality of service to derive more satisfaction in them as satisfaction leads to loyalty concepts.
The supposed influence of nationality on expectations and perceptions of service quality was looked into applying analysis of variance. The outcomes established that expectations change by nationality groupings, with statistical substantial divergences found in 13 of the 22 expectation statements as depicted in Table 3. The vital F-Values and p-levels alone are indicated for each statement. Post-hoc comparing of means applying Scheffe test exposed important differences between the subsequent expectations arguments compared to respondents: workers of the firm will inform commuters precisely when the service will be accomplished (p-level=0.03), employees provide punctual service (p-level=0.02), employees are ever ready to assist passengers (p-level=0.04), passengers will feel safe when transacting with this company (p-level=0.02), and in the end, the firm has the clients’ best interests in their minds (p-level=0.009).
Table 3: ANOVA Critical F-Values & p-levels for Expectations & Perception Statements.
|EXPECTATION STATEMENTS||F-Value||p-level||PERCEPTION STATEMENTS||F-Value||p-level|
Likewise, ANOVA consequences on perception statements depicted that riders’ sensing of service quality diverged by nationality groups. Statistically significant divergences were detected in 20 of the 22 perception statements as depicted by the spotlit p-levels in Table 3. The Scheffe technique for post hoc comparability of means disclosed that perception statement three was ranked differently by different respondents (p-level=0.039), where the previous had improved perceptions than the latter. Some of the respondents had better sensing for that assertion when compared to some others (p-level=0.0007). The statement that the Airline industry assures to carry out orders time-bound, was ranked differently by the respondents. They were in reality unbiased to that statement equated to respondents who are frequent users of air travel (p-level=0.004). Whether Airline industries executed their services correctly was placed differently by the respondents (p-level=0.006).
Some of the customers disagreed with the statement that the airline industries will inform about the exact time when their services will be executed (p-level=0.001). A few of the respondents agreed that they experienced punctual service from the company’s workers when compared to respondents who differed (p-level=0.000). The perception of the respondents about employees of Airline industries who were willing to assist when compared was not in agreement (p-level=0.0006). A comparable association can be seen between the perceptions of frequent airline travelers with those who do not frequently travel (p-level=0.000). Additionally, some of the airline users were neutral to the statement that the workforce of the airline industries was by no means active to react to the petitions when compared to others (p-level=0.0009). Consumers on the whole (p-level=0.02) and of different nationalities (p-level=0.0001) had better perceptions of trust level about the industries. Overall consumers were disinterested when questioned about the level of alleged safety of transactions with Airline industries (p-level=0.003).
The influence of demographic variables on the keyed out groups of service quality precepts was analyzed utilizing chi-square tests of affiliations. A major conflict was detected amongst the different clusters of service perceptions and nationality (p-level=0.00013). Out of those who comprehended service levels to be good, 61.6% were other country citizens. Yet, some of the consumers perceived service levels to be poor and they formed the majority (81.8%). Gender did not influence service precepts, whereas age had considerable control of perceptions (p-level=0.009). 72.7% aged between 19 and 27 years perceived service levels to be poor and obsolete. Test of connection between initially recognized sub-groupings of respondents (international tourists, travel agents, and students) and the k-means algorithm applied to group respondents, brought out the presence of an important relationship (p-level=0.000). The greater part of students (81.8%) felt service levels to be poor, while 51.6% of travel agents felt that service levels were good. 52.1% comprising of international tourists were indifferent to service levels.
From the above analysis, it can be seen that customers’ perceptions of quality of service are the outcome of their level of satisfaction and that determines their loyalty to the respective service provider. Moreover, though genders have got nothing to relate to satisfaction on service quality concepts, the most decisive group that responds in proportion to the perception on the service quality standard is the young people who are the most dissatisfied with the quality of service in the airline industry. So, their perceptions impact negatively upon their loyalty.
A flight has many sub-components, and sustainable competitive advantage is derived from the ability of the airline to master every element of these sub-components, making it harder for competitors to imitate. Service quality is one of these components that offer an organization a significant opportunity to a differential advantage in the market place. An airline must originate a ‘wow-effect’ and regularly surprise the customers to maintain their loyalty levels. It must be recognized that changing customer perception is somewhat difficult. However, the placement of the right employees in the right place, and the adoption of the right technology and service culture in an organization can significantly improve service encounter experience to force customers to review service quality perceptions to develop loyalty or repurchase intentions.
Cluster analysis revealed that there were only two identified clusters of service expectations. They are the passengers who were indifferent to service levels and those who have agreed that airlines provided excellent service quality. Different service strategies need to be adopted for students, travel agents on educational tours, and international tourists. Despite the high coefficients for Cronbach alpha for the different service dimensions, cluster analysis revealed major discrepancies between expectations and perceptions. On all service dimensions, there are service delivery shortfalls. The most problematic dimension is reliability, which is similar to the findings from previous studies applying the SERVQUAL model but is also recognized to be the most important service dimension (Parasuraman et al., 1991).
The human interaction dimension or intervention in service delivery is not perceived to be of high quality among students only. International tourists and travel agents have on average a positive perception of the softer skills of employees. Cluster analysis of SERVQUAL scores showed that statements relating to service dimensions, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy had marginally lower gaps between expectations and perceptions compared to reliability. Llosa et al. (1998) suggest that these dimensions could be fused into the larger dimension of task-related receptiveness. The lowest gap was for the service dimension tangibles that affect customers in physiological, psychological, sociological, cognitive, and emotional ways (Sureshchandar et al., 2001).
Likewise, experience and learning change both the nature and the number of service dimensions (Llosa et al., 1998). Specifically, travel agents are knowledgeable about the service offer and are therefore better assessors of the service quality of the airline. They perceive reliability, responsiveness, and assurance more favorably. The overall findings of the study seem to suggest that poor perceptions of service quality tend to be associated with students and their loyalty is far below the others. Parasuraman et al. (1988) define service quality as an individual’s general attitude towards a firm. This definition suggests that students have a negative attitude as they are very sensitive to the in-flight service environment.
The quantitative research findings support to some extent what was found in the qualitative research. The heterogeneity of the sample and the ANOVA results highlight the importance of crafting specific service strategies for each segment of the market and communicating the right service attributes to the different target markets. Service offerings should be tailored to meet the requirements of travel agents, which are convenient schedules, on-time performance, flawless cabin crew service, and excellent tangible cues. International tourists require convenient schedules, on-time performance, good in-flight entertainment and service, efficient pre-flight procedures, and courteous staff. Students require affordable fares, convenient schedules, good in-flight food, entertainment, and service to improve their satisfaction level that reflects on their perception of quality service leading to loyalty. The company must view each service encounter as an opportunity to enhance customer participation in service delivery and customization of the service product. Such steps will enhance the satisfaction level of the customers on service quality which in turn will imbibe in them a better perception that promotes loyalty.
There should be increased interaction between the management and the front-line employees to provide opportunities to share information on customer expectations and perceptions. A more in-depth understanding of service encounter dynamics (pre-flight, in-flight, post-flight) will offer the management the opportunity to redesign the services and service control processes that are inefficient, to achieve quality interactions at every service encounter. Customer satisfaction depends on the management and monitoring of individual service encounters. To develop loyalty, service encounter interactions must be flawlessly resulting in a positive state of mind built over time. Again, it is worth mentioning that all service attributes contribute significantly to the flight experience and therefore management has the task of ensuring the error-free performance of employees in terms of service delivery at each end. Also, management commitment to service quality is perhaps the single most important determinant of good service delivery along with employee empowerment.
With regards to employee management, it was found that employees and customers perceived control as a critical determinant of the quality of interactions that institute the service encounters. Increased perceive control levels lead to more favorable perceptions of service experience. Organizational rules, procedures, and culture are perceived to some extent to limit or enhance employees’ ability to provide outstanding service to customers. Both employees and management through their actions are perhaps hindering the achievement of world-class airline status.
Moreover, the results indicate that there are significant differences or inconsistencies in service quality expectations and perceptions based on nationality. South African and British respondents have better perceptions of service levels in comparison to others. This study further confirms the relationship between the cultural background of passengers and service quality perceptions, and therefore, marketing strategies should be altered to have the greatest effect on passenger groups, and there should be constant efforts to invest in training of staff to be responsive to meet the expectations of customers. The study validates the findings of Nel et al. (1997), who demonstrated that SERVQUAL as an instrument should be modified because of cross-cultural differences. Culture and age are also major factors that contribute to individual differences in behavior.
Finally, company image and reputation, brand image, and personality are to be considered as an extension of the communication strategy of the airlines to make it effective. The company must strive to develop word-of-mouth, as this form of communication is more important to customers than mass media advertising in cross-cultural settings. Brand reputation for high service should be cultivated through flawless service delivery, for, it used to serve as an important proxy of quality. Therefore, brand-building must be a priority. There are positive relationships between brand images, service quality, repurchase intentions, and willingness to recommend. These positive relationships are causative to the progress of not only the airline industry but also of any other service industry.
During the current research, it was noticed that most of the airline firms react to certain external pressures for helping their customers. These firms must find out a proactive way of meeting the specific needs of the customers by generating proper awareness about their level of expectations regarding satisfaction and service quality. There should be a clear pre-set of customers’ anticipated expectations on the part of the firms so that they can satiate and deliver the requisite service that is guaranteed to the customers, and finally, ask them to provide feedback that is essential to improve the quality of services.
The present study has shown that structural weaknesses in consumer handling policies and the lack of innovation in the area of customer satisfaction are the two major forces that hold back the progress of the airline industry. Adjustments in these two key areas, with a specific focus on moderating profits, remain the ways to mend the dysfunctional zones of the industry.
Customers in a given market will never remain the same and hence the airline industry with its diversified demographic customer chain must look forward to customer segmentation based on their expectations and satisfaction level. For instance, during this study, it was found that the majority of those who gave negative opinions about service quality were students and consumers on business and other official trips. Most of the airlines indeed resort to aggressive marketing only during the high seasons focusing on tourists. The business travelers’ expectations will not be met to a satisfactory level until and unless the firms can market and provide services for tourists during the high seasons and concentrate on the business category in the low seasons.
The staff of the airline industry, especially the contact staff, must give much attention to the clients and interact with them at every turn. The attitude, motivation, and role of the workers are very important in meeting customer satisfaction and this starts at the time of hiring. The airline firms should ensure that they hire staff that value customer service. The staff should be provided orientation programs that enable them to understand the relationship between the company’s mission and service quality as well as customer satisfaction. Staff motivation is an important element because staff satisfaction is directly proportional to customer satisfaction. This can be done by providing adequate remuneration to the staff and rewarding them for their exemplary performance-based on motivation and pre-set goals which are measured from time to time (Kandampully, Mok & Sparks, 2001).
To monitor the progress, they need to come up with a plan that advocates the goals of the airline firms with a description of the present activities supported by an evaluation of customer information needs, expectations, and preferences or priorities. Along with this, there should be scrupulous action to compare the services it is providing with those they should have provided against the ones provided by international firms. This approach will secure a framework for airline services and will act as a guide to their policymaking. The firms should also set aims and objectives which will define their priorities by spelling out clearly what is important and what is not. For instance, a commitment can be written as spelled by the customer and each employee should adhere to that.
Pricing in service industries is mostly influenced by the objectives of the firm as well as the response of consumers to price changes. During the peak periods, the firms should charge high prices so that they maximize profit, because of the high demand for airline services from the tourists that travel all over the world for their vacations. However, they should also deliver value for the money taken from the customer by way of providing high-quality services. This means that the tourists should find the comfort and convenience that they need during their holidays. Effective communication about the services and associated benefits offered by a firm is a somewhat difficult task for most businesses due to its intangible nature. That was why some of the respondents have remarked that they were not at all aware of certain services provided in the airline industry. The following are the other recommendations to streamline the proper functioning of the industry.
- The airlines must concentrate on working cost reductions so that a portion of such savings should reflect on the airfares. A reduction in operation cost means a reduction in fares, which is beneficial to customers in terms of service quality.
- There should be concrete steps to make Customer relationship management (CRM) a major tool for maintaining strong customer relationships. CRM is a holistic strategy and must be regarded as such. Being the main decisive factor, Customer Segmentation must be based on values and needs.
- Airlines must discard a strict follower approach and opt for the investment of maximum return to survive the competition.
- Adoption of methods to implement a real consumer-oriented approach by the airline industry will enable them to acquire and develop high-value customers. Through the integration of customer analytics and decision making techniques, the airlines can utilize the information gathered, to differentiate different levels of service founded on customer value. It will also make the operational decisions effective, which in turn will act as the platform for short and long-term operational success, management, and growth. The airlines can use customer analytics for the improvement of management and pricing related to customer segments. Thus the pricing strategies will simplify the fares so that more customers are attracted to the airline firms resulting in increased revenue. Also, every airline must collect feedback from the employees on service quality regularly (Boland et al., 2002).
- New researches should be conducted to find out how far the airlines commit to develop and maintain cost leadership and differentiation strategy to get a competitive edge on low cost and high levels of differentiation. Measuring the airfares of different airlines will help the passengers know of the value they are given without paying a premium, which also accounts for service quality. The financial performance can be evaluated from profit margins, the return of investments, and stock price. The secondary data collected for these researches can be used in an open-ended manner to compare the successful airlines that have the best-cost provider strategy against the airlines that are stuck in the middle. These measures may help the managers to develop service quality and relationship marketing strategies. Moreover, the researchers as well as managers can identify the activities that are linked to overall relationship, service quality, the impact of recent trends on satisfaction levels, and the resultant perception and loyalty.
- Since these variables are determinant on the repurchase intention of passengers, airlines should develop and implement various strategies based on their behavioral intentions. Failure in providing quality services will tarnish and damage the formation of an airline image. Therefore, more empirical studies must be initiated in this area to find out how far is the perception of service quality and behavioral intentions of domestic customers are different from that of the international passengers and how the demographic features like genders, age, income, social status, education, etc. will determine these behavioral intentions and perceptions of service quality, airline image, and loyalty (Park, Robertson & Wu, 2005).
The dissertation has defined the aim and objectives of the research, and the hypothesis has helped in fulfilling the findings. The research, therefore, has managed to identify the service quality factors which are categorized as the deciding quality factors related to the personnel, airplane, and the airport. To exhibit how the consumers prioritize the service qualities, such quality factors were put in the order of preference so that they will help in meeting the second objective. It has also shown that there was an inconsistency between consumer perceptions on quality viewed as a part of the managerial strategy by the written standards of service quality in the airline industry.
The last objective was met by recommendations drawn from the research findings, which outlined how customers’ expectations of service quality can be effectively managed. The research questions in the questionnaire were able to provide answers from the respondents that helped to capture data that was relevant in meeting the above objectives. There was a constant effort from the researcher to ask the consumers to state their feelings and perceptions on various variables in the airline industry and also rank them in order of priority. The research was also well planned because the researcher first contacted the secondary data sources before the collection of data from the primary sources to determine and acquire the missing points in the secondary sources (Kothari, 2008).
The information from previous researches gave a clear picture of the airline industry, the determining peak and off-peak periods, and operations of the airlines and their strategies. In addition to this, demographic information was also obtained from secondary data. Through this research, it is found that there exists a gap between managerial strategies in meeting consumer needs and consumer’s’ expectation that leads to satisfaction and loyalty. There was also a contribution from the researcher to the management side on the ways of identifying and meeting specific customer needs. Suggestions on how to improve future dissertations include (1) research on international airline companies to determine the customers’ preferences (2) More empirical studies to find out how far is the perception of service quality and behavioral intentions of domestic customers are different from that of the international passengers, and how the demographic features like genders, age, income, social status, education, etc. will determine these behavioral intentions and perceptions of service quality, airline image, and loyalty.
Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., and Day G.S. (1998) Marketing Research. NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Airline Product and Benchmarking, Skytraxresearch. Web.
Asubonteng, P., McCleary, K.J., and Swan J.E. (1996) SERVQUAL revisited: a critical review of service quality. The Journal of Services Marketing, 10 (6), pp. 62-81.
Avrikan, N. K. (1999) Quality customer service demands human contact. The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17, pp. 61-74.
Babakus, E., and Boller G. W. (1992) An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL Scale. Journal of Business Research, 24 (3), pp. 253-268.
Babakus E., and Mangold G. (1992) Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation. Health Services Research, 26 (6), pp. 767-786.
Babbie, E. (2008) The Basics of Social Research. Belmont. CA: Wadsworth.
Barnes, T. (2002) Crisp, Clean, and Cold. Lufthansa: Customer Review. Web.
Barsky, E. and Labagh, R. (1992) A strategy for customer satisfaction. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 35.
Berry, L. L., and Parasuraman, A. (1991) Marketing services: competing through quality. NY: FREE PRESS.
Bite, M. (2011) British Airways Customer review Economy class.
Bitner, M. J, Booms, B. H., and Tetreault, M.S. (1990) The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favourable and Unfavourable Incidents. Journal of Marketing.
Bloemer, J. M., and Kasper, H. P. (1995) The complex relationship between consumer satisfaction and brand loyalty, Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, pp. 311-329.
Boland, D., Morrison, D., and O’Neill, S. (2002) The future of airline CRM, IBM Institute for Business Value, IBM Corporation, NY. [Online]. Web.
Brown, S. W. (1991) Service quality: Multidisciplinary and multinational perspectives. New York: Lexington Books.
Butler, G. F., and Keller, M. R. (1992) The cost-constrained global airline industry environment: What is quality? Transportation Quarterly, 46, pp. 599-618.
Carr, S. (2008) Olympic Airlines review [Online]. Web.
Carman, J. (1990) Consumer perception of service quality: An assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. J Retail, 66 (1), pp. 33–55.
Cauchick Miguel, P. A., Silva, M.T.D., Chiosini, E.L., & Schützer, K. (n.d.), Assessment of service quality dimensions: a study in a vehicle repair service chain.
Chang, D. (2003) A comparative study of measuring air liners’ service quality. J Korean Soc Qual Manag, 31 (4), pp. 36–54.
Chang D., Kim Y., & Jeon S. (2003) A study on the evaluation of Incheon international airport’s service quality. Manag Res, 32(4), pp. 983–999
Chappers, D. (1st Aug, 2011) Excellent service: Review of EasyJet. Web.
Churchill G. A. (1979) A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research.
Churchill, G. A. (1982) An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, pp. 491-504.
Churchill, GAASC. (1982) An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, pp. 491-504.
Creswell, J., (2003) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. London, UK: Sage Publications Print.
Cronin, J. and Taylor S. (1992) Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. J Mark 56 (3), pp. 55–68.
Cunningham, L.F., Young, C.E., and Lee, M. (2002) Cross-cultural perspectives of service quality and risk in air transportation. Journal of Air Transportation, 7 (1), pp. 3-26.
Cyprus Airways Catering Under Scrutiny: News report. Web.
Davis, T. (1999) Different service firms, different core competencies. Bus Horiz , 42, pp. 23–33.
Daft L. R. (2006) The new era of Management, International Edition.
Dirnberger, C. (2011) Austrian Airlines customer review [Online].
Dostaler, I. and Flouris, T (n.d.) Business Strategy and Competition for the Future in the Airline Industry, Aerlines Magazine e-zine edition, Issue 28. [Online]. Web.
Edwards, M. (23rd Sept., 2010) British Airways Economy Class Flight Review. Web.
Garvin, D. (1984) What dose product quality really mean. Sloan Manag Rev, 26 (1), pp. 25–28.
Goliath. (2006) The effects of individual dimensions of airline service quality: findings from Australian domestic air passengers, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management.
Gordon G. L. (1993) Service Quality and Customer Loyalty in the Commercial Airline Industry. Journal of Travel Research October,1993, 32 (2), pp. 16-24.
Grigoroudis, E. and Siskos, Y. (2009) Customer Satisfaction Evaluation: Methods for Measuring and Implementing Service Quality. New York: Springer.
Gronroos, C. (1978) A service quality model and its marketing implication. Eur J Mark, 18 (4), pp. 36–44.
Haskett, J. L., Sasser E. W. and Schlesinger L. A. (1997) The Service Profit Chain. New York, Free Press.
Hernon, P., and Whitman J. R. (2001) Delivering satisfaction and service quality: A customer-based approach for libraries. Washington. DC: ALA Editions.
Hussain, K. and Ekiz, E.H. (n.d.) Perceptions of service quality in North Cyprus Airline Industry: A path analysis application, Eastern Mediterranean University and school of hotel and Tourism Management. [Online].
Hunt, J. (n.d.) Quality of Customer Service is Most Important [Online].
IATA Annual Report. (2007) The economic impact of Air Service Liberalization [Online].
Jain, S. K., and Gupta, G. (2004) Measuring service quality: SERVQUAL vs. SERVPERF scales. Vikalpa, 29 (2), pp. 25-37.
Jillot. (2011) Ground customer service lets it down: Review of Emirates. Web.
Johns, N., Avci, T., and Karatepe, O.M. (2004) Measuring service quality of travel agents: evidence from Northern Cyprus. The Services Industries Journal, 24 (3), pp. 82-100.
Jones, M., Mothersbaugh, D, Beatty S. (2002) Why customers stay: measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes. J Bus Res, 55 (6): pp. 441–450.
Kandampully, J., Mok, C. & Spaks, B. A. (2001) Service quality management in hospitality, tourism, and leisure Hospitality, travel and tourism. Binghamton. NY: The Haworth Press.
Kotler, P. (2003) Defining Marketing for the Twenty-First Century. New Delhi: New Age International.
Kothari, C. R. (2008) Research Methodology: Methods And Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International.
Khan, N. (n.d) Customer Expectations and Gaps in Service Quality. An Empirical Study of Civil Aviation Industry in India.
Khan, M. N., & Dutt, V. R. (2006a) Aviation marketplace and innovative business solutions: Evidences from low cost carriers in India. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Business Strategies in the Borderless World. Manesar. India: Amity Business School.
Khan, M. N., Dutt, V. R., & Bansal, S. C. (2006b). Global challenges and entrepreneurship in civil aviation industry: A case study of India. Proceedings of Global Conference on Job And Wealth Creation Through Entrepreneurship, Management Development Institute (MDI). Gurgaon, India, & School of Public Policy: George Mason University, Virginia, USA.
Khan, M. N., Dutt, V. R. and Bansal, S. C. (2006c) Role of IT in enhancing service quality: An empirical study of domestic airlines in India. Proceedings of the international conference on “Service Industry: Challenges & Opportunities”. Waljat Colleges of Applied Sciences, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Khan, M. N., Dutt, V. R. and Bansal, S. C. (2007) Customer perceptions and expectations of service quality: A case study of domestic airline industry in India. Proceedings of the conference on Marketing. Ahmedabad: Indian Institute of Management.
Krosnick, J.A., and Fabrigar, L.R. (1997) Designing rating scales for effective management in surveys. Survey Management and Process Quality, pp.141-164.
Lam, S. Y, Shankar, V, Erramilli, M. K., and Murthy B. (2004) Customer Value, Satisfaction, Loyalty, and Switching Cost: An Illustration From a Business-to-Business Service Context, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32 (3), pp. 293-311.
Laczniak, R.N., Decarlo, T.E., and Ramaswami, S.N. (2001) Journal of Consumer Psychology, JSTOR, Volume: 11, Issue: 1, pp. 57-73
Lee, M., Cunningham L. (2001) A cost/benefit approach to understanding service loyalty. J Serv Mark, 15 (2), pp. 113–130.
Lewis, B. R., & Mitchell, V. W. (1990) Defining and measuring the quality of customer service. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 8 (6), pp. 11-17.
Ling, F. I., Lin, K., and Lu, J. L. (2005) Difference in service quality of cross- strait airlines and its effect on passengers’ preferences. Journal of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, pp. 798-813.
Llosa, S., Chandon, J. L., and Orsingher, C. (1998) An empirical study of SERVQUAL’s dimensionality. The Service IndustriesJournal, 18 (2), pp. 16-44.
Loannou, A. (2011) Cyprus Airways customer review. Web.
Mayr, T., & Zins, A.H., (2007) Correcting for Response Style Effects on Service Quality Measures [Online]. Web.
Mittal, V., and Kamakura, W. A. (2001) Satisfaction, Repurchase Intent, and Repurchase Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Customer Characteristics. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, pp. 131-142.
Morash, W. A., and Ozment, J. (1994) Toward management of transportation service quality, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 7.
Nadiri, H, Hussain, K., & Ekiz, H. E. (n.d) An investigation on the factors influencing passengers’ loyalty in the North Cyprus national airline, North Cyprus.
Nadiri, H., and Hussain, K., (2005) Diagnosing the zone of tolerance for hotel services. Managing Service Quality, 15 (3), pp. 259-277.
Nadiri, H., Hussain, K., Ekiz, E.H., and Erdogan, S., (2008) An investigation on the factors influencing passengers’ loyalty in the North Cyprus national airline. Total Quality Management Journal, 20 (3), pp 265-280.
Nel, D., Pitt, L.F., and Berthon, P. R. (1997) The SERVQUAL instrument: reliability and validity in South Africa. South African Journal of Business Management, 28 (3), pp. 113-23.
Ng, I. C. L. (2008) The pricing and revenue management of services: a strategic approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
Nejati, M., Nejati, M., & Shafae, A. (1984) Ranking airlines’ service quality factors using a fuzzy approach: study of the Iranian society. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26 (3), pp. 247 – 260.
Ostrowski, P. L., O’Brien, T. V., and Gordon, G. L. (1993) Service quality and customer loyalty in the commercial airline industry, Journal of Travel Research, 32, pp. 16-2.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service, Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing , 49 (4), pp. 41-50.
Parasuraman, A, Berry, L. L., and Zeithaml, V. A., (1988) SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale For Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality, Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), pp. 12-40.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithmal, V., Berry L. (1988b) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail , 64 (1), pp. 12–40.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., and Berry, L. L. (1994) Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 58, pp. 111-24.
Park, J. W., Robertson, R. & Wu, C.L. (2005) The Journal of Tourism Studies Vol. 16, No. 1 [Online]. Web.
Park, J. W., Robertson, R., and Wu, C. L. (2004) The effect of airline service on passengers’ behavioral intentions: A Korean case study. Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, pp. 435-439.
Prayag, G., & Dookhony-Ramphul, K. (n.d) Clustering Passengers’ Expectations & Perceptions of Service Quality at Air Mauritius. Department of Management, Faculty of Law & Management, University of Mauritius, Mauritius.
Protection of air passengers-COM (2000) 365, Commission of the European Union Communities. [Online]. Web.
Ratcliff, D. (2011) Methods of data analysis in qualitative research. Web.
Render, B & Heizer, J. (2008) Operations Management. Prentice Hall.
Robledo, M. A. (1996, 1998) ‘Integrating Customer Expectations’, Measuring and Managing Service quality, pp. 22-31.
Santos J. (2003) E-service quality: a model of virtual service quality dimensions. Manag Serv Qual, 13 (3): pp.233–246.
Singh, J. (1988) “Consumer complaint intentions and behavior: definitional and taxonomical issues,” Journal of Marketing, 52, pp. 93-107.
Smith, A.K., Bolton, R.N., and Wagner, J. (1999) “A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery”, Journal of Marketing Research, 36, pp. 356-72.
Shaelou, S. L. (2010) The EU and Cyprus: principles and strategies of full integration. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Stefanou, C. (2005) Cyprus and the EU: the road to accession. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
Sureschandar, G.S., Rajendran, C., and Kamalanabhan, T.J. (2001) Customer perceptions of service quality: A critique. Total Quality Management, 12 (1), 111-24.
Thyer, B., (2010) The handbook of social work research methods. Thousand Oaks. California: SAGE Publications Print.
Vavra, T. G. (1997) Improving your measurement of customer satisfaction: a guide to creating, conducting, analyzing, and reporting customer satisfaction measurement programs. Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press.
White, L & Galbraith, M. (2000) “Customer Determinants of Perceived Service Quality in a Business to Business Context: A Study within the Health Services Industry,” Visionary Marketing for the 21st Century: Facing the Challenge, pp. 1393-1394.
Williams, C., and Buswell, J. (2003) Service quality in leisure and tourism. Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing.
Zeithaml, V.A., and Bitner, M.J. (2000) Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus across Firms, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Appendix – Questionnaire
I am a student of MBA program at University of Leicester and I am currently working on my final research thesis entitled: “An analysis of consumers perceptions on service quality in the airline industry: A study of airlines operated in Cyprus”. In this matter I need your assistance in responding to the attached questionnaire. I value your thoughts, knowledge and perceptions on this issue. Your views would constitute an important element in generation of primary data for my research. The questionnaires are on an anonymous and confidential basis and your responses will be used for statistical analysis only.
If you have any questions about this research survey, please do not hesitate to contact me on: 00357-99677760.
Elena Loizidou Philippou
The questions below have been designed to gain useful information on customer perceptions of service quality and loyalty factors in the airline industry that is operated through Larnaca Airport in Cyprus.
Please select the answer that best reflects your perception of the level of reliability within the airline industry in any of the listed items.
- Do you find the airlines that are operated from Larnaca Airport to be reliable and dependable?
- Have you ever experienced any flight delays in your experience with the any airline industry that are operated from Larnaca?
- If yes, how long was the delay?
- Are the airport and airline personnel reliable in taking care of passenger needs?
- Are the time schedules given by the airlines that are operated from Larnaca accurate and reliable?
The questions below require your assessment of the level of assurance that exists in the airline industry. Please provide a detailed account of your answer.
- What is your understanding of service quality in the airline industry?
- In your own flying experience, explain whether the airlines industry have knowledge on how to provide service quality to its customers?
- Provide examples of what you think are the aspects that determine whether an airline has knowledge of service quality?
- In your own understanding, what do you think are the most suitable service qualities factors that should be used in the airline industry?
- Does the airline industry give any priority to service quality in its service delivery?
The following questions are meant to measure the tangibles of service quality within the airline industry. Select the answers that you think best reflect the tangibility aspect of the airline industry that are operated from Larnaca airport.
Airline service quality
Are the aircraft clean and modern-looking?
- Very Poor
- Moderately Good
Is the quality of food served in the plane of a high quality?
- Very Poor
- Moderately Good
Are the plane’s toilets clean?
- Very Poor
- Moderately Good
Are the plane’s seats clean?
- Very Poor
- Moderately Good
Is the quality of air-conditioning in the planes good?
- Very Poor
- Moderately Good
Are the plane seats comfortable?
- Very Poor
- Moderately Good
Service quality in the airport terminals
The table below is meant to measure the level of service quality within the terminals that are operated by various airlines operated from Larnaca. Please tick the option that you think best which represents the level of service quality in the airport terminals based on your experience as either a frequent or non-frequent flyer.
|Description||Very Poor||Poor||Good||Very Good|
|a.||Cleanliness of the airport toilets|
|b.||Number of shops in the airport|
|c.||Availability of parking in the airport|
|d.||Ability of the airport to hold a large number of passengers in one day|
|e.||Quality of air conditioning within the airport|
|f.||Quality of signage within the airport|
|g.||Availability of trolleys within the airport|
|h.||Comfort of the waiting lounges in the terminals|
|i.||Quality of security within the airport terminals|
Please select the options that best represent your perception of airport personnel who include flight attendants, security personnel, terminal workers, luggage handlers and check-in agents.
- What is the general attitude of employees in the airport?
- Very Poor
- Moderately Good
- Do airline personnel provide you with exact answers to your questions?
- Do you think the level of employee education and experience is adequate for all airport and terminal staff?
- Do the personnel show any personal care to passengers?
- What is the awareness of airline personnel in their duties?
- Very Poor
- Very Good
- Have you experienced error-free reservations and ticketing transactions?
- Do the employees have the proper knowledge to answer your questions?
- Do the airline personnel have any empathy?
- Do the airline personnel give passengers any priority in their duties?
Image of the airlines
What is the availability of low price ticket offerings?
- Very Poor
- Moderately Good
What is the consistency of ticket prices with a given service?
- Very Poor
- Moderately Good
What is the image of the airline and airport?
- Very Poor
- Moderately Good
Empathy is an important service quality of many businesses around the world. It refers to the ability of a company and its personnel to identify and sympathize with the patients needs.
- Based on your understanding of empathy, do you think that the airline industry is empathetic to your needs as a flying customer?
- Have you ever experienced any delayed flight arrivals and departures during your flying experience?
- Are you able to access transportation from the city to the airport?
- Have you ever lost your luggage when flying with any of the airlines that are operated from the Larnaca airport?
- If your answer is yes, was the airline sympathetic to your situation?
- How did the airline and airport staff react to your situation?
- Do you find the locations of the airline offices accessible?
- Do you have access to compensation schemes in the event of an accident while flying or within the airport?
- Are the numbers of flights enough to satisfy the passengers’ demands?
What is the response rate of the airline industry that is operated from Larnaca to the following aspects of service delivery?
|b.||Passenger comfort during flights|
|g.||Communication of delayed flights|
|h.||Meal service during flights|
|i.||Response rate to customer complaints|
|j.||Counter check-in services|
Please describe whether your satisfaction with the airline has increased or decreased. (This question is intended to gather information about the passengers’ satisfaction levels and perception of service quality).
- Describe your current impression of the airline. Has it improved with the number of times you have flown with the airline?
- What is your current attitude towards the airline company?
This section will measure repurchase intentions as well as the loyalty of airline customers
- Do know the meaning of repurchase intention?
- Have you ever repurchased an airline ticket?
- If yes, what was the reason?
- Do you consider the airline to be your first choice of air transportation?
- Will you continue using this airline for your future travel plans?
- Will you recommend the airline to other people?
The following questions are meant to measure the tangibles of service quality within the airline industry in order of priority. Tick appropriately.
Airline service quality
Please tick the option that you think best represents the priority you give to each of the service quality factors in the aircraft
|Description||Not important||Least important||Moderately important||Very important||Most important|
|Aircraft cleanliness and modern-looking?|
|Quality of food served in the plane|
|Cleanliness of plane toilets|
|Quality of air-conditioning in the planes|
|Comfort of plane seats|
Service quality in the airport terminals
Please tick the option that you think best represents the priority you give to each of the service quality factors in the airport terminals
|Description||Not important||Least important||Moderately important||Very important||Most important|
|Cleanliness of the airport toilets|
|Number of shops in the airport|
|Availability of parking in the airport|
|Quality of air conditioning within the airport|
|Availability of trolleys within the airport|
|Comfort of the waiting lounges in the terminals|
Please select the options that best represent priority you give to the services offered by airport personnel including flight attendants, security personnel, terminal workers, luggage handlers and check-in agents.
|Description||Not important||Least important||Moderately important||Very important||Most important|
|Whether the airline personnel provide you with exact answers to your questions|
|The general attitude of employees in the airport|
|Whether the personnel show any personal care to passengers|
|The awareness of airline personnel in their duties|
|Whether the airline personnel have any empathy|
|Do the airline personnel give passengers any priority in their duties|
What recommendations, if any, would you suggest to improve service quality within the airline industry in general with particular mention about the flights that are operated from Larnaca Airport?
Thank You for Your Kind Cooperation!