End-of-Life Decision-Making Research Methodology

In their research, Ko, Nelson-Becker, Park, and Shin (2013) seek to locate the tools for building a more coherent framework for end-of-life issues management among Korean adults. Since there is no particular need for quantifying the outcomes of the analysis, the authors of the study use the qualitative research design. Thus, opportunities for an in-depth exploration of the issue emerge. Furthermore, the proposed method helps to study the nature of the problem and the strategy for addressing it, thus embracing a wide array of factors that affect the development of the issue.

Ko et al. (2013) hypothesize that the focus on culture-related concerns and preferences that Korean patients have contributes to a rapid rise in the quality of care. Thus, the opportunity for managing the needs of patients in the neonatal care environment is created. In addition, the study places a strong emphasis on the need for patient education and patient-nurse communication.

Since the authors of the research use a coherent method for evaluating the available solutions and studying the problem, the results can be deemed as credible. In addition, the internal validity of the results is high due to the control that the authors of the study have over extraneous variables such as culture-specific issues. The levels of external validity are also quite impressive since the suggested model can also be applied to other settings.

Reference

Ko, E., Nelson-Becker, H., Park, Y., & Shin, M. (2013). End-of-life decision making in older Korean adults: Concerns, preferences, and expectations. Educational Gerontology, 39(2), 71–81.