The first face-to-face presidential debate took place on September 26, 2016. Hillary Clinton kept her cool, while Donald Trump was impassioned and engaging. The meaningful part of it was dedicated to economic issues. Teresa Garcia, a 20-year-old civil engineering student, carefully followed the presidential campaign and the debate as well. Tyler Miller, 21, majoring in marketing, assessed Monday’s arguments as a turning point in the run for the presidency.
specifically for you
for only $16.05 $11/page
“Clinton’s position on creating new jobs and raising taxes on the wealthiest is appealing to me,” Ms. Garcia said. “I acclaim her emphasis on equal pay for women’s work because, as a future female job seeker, I would like to gain earnings which are proportional to my competence and professional experience, and do not depend on my gender.”
“The tax increase will not create new jobs. Clinton pictures a bright future with developing industries; however, as Donald Trump said, she does not have a precise plan,” Mr. Miller argued. “I agree with Trump’s statement that businesses are going out of the county because of the inadequate policies. The tax extension will not help in preventing this tendency.”
“Trump uses more engaging language for the majority of people,” Ms. Garcia concluded. “However, voters should not be led away by its simplicity.”
“Trump’s vehemence and clarity indicate his desire to communicate the complex issues with accuracy,” Mr. Miller replied.